Product architecture
The data model and the boundaries between the parts, decided before anything is built. That is the decision that costs the most to reverse later.
- Data model
- API boundaries
- Choices documented
S3V
NO
S3V
NO
A SaaS product is not a website with a login. It is subscriptions, roles, access control, email that has to arrive and a database that still has to be correct in two years. We build that part too.
See what you getThe parts a product needs to survive paying users, not just a demo in front of an investor.
The data model and the boundaries between the parts, decided before anything is built. That is the decision that costs the most to reverse later.
Login, invitations, several users per customer and roles that actually limit what people see. Multi-tenant from the start where that is needed.
Subscriptions, trials, upgrades, failed payments and invoices. The part that looks simple until it has to handle a card that expires.
The screens customers use daily, and the numbers you need yourself to see whether the product is being used or only paid for.
Deploy from git, backups that have been tested, monitoring that alerts before the customer calls. Not manual rollout from a laptop.
Access control, encryption, a log of who did what. Built in, not bolted on after the first security review.
From idea to production. Four steps, and we do not disappear after the third.
We go deep into your problem before writing a single line of code.
Architecture, UX and data flow. Planned before anything at all is built.
We work fast without taking shortcuts. Clean code, tested, deployed.
We stay on after launch. Adjusting, fixing and scaling.
Want to see the craft before you buy it? Ten pages built with no brief and no deadline, source open. See the lab →
What usually decides whether a SaaS project goes well or runs aground.
Weeks, not months, if the scope is held to what the product has to do to be worth paying for. We cut features, not quality.
An estimate after a conversation about scope. What drives the price is the number of integrations and how much has to be right from day one, not the number of screens.
Yes. The repo is yours, with you, with the full history. You should be able to change developer without rebuilding the product.
Because it is boring, well documented and easy to find people for. We pick the stack for whoever runs it after us, not for what is new.
Often yes. We start with a review of the code, the database and the operations, and say honestly if rebuilding is cheaper than inheriting.
We measure before we optimise. Most performance problems in a young SaaS are a missing database index, not a server that is too small.
